Analisis Kualitatif Pemecahan Masalah dan Ketergantungan Kognitif Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Penggunaan Generative AI
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 0
Abstract
This qualitative descriptive study analyzes Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) usage patterns and their impact on pre-service teachers' problem-solving capabilities through Polya’s framework. Data from ten informants were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. Findings reveal that GenAI serves as effective "cognitive scaffolding" during the understanding and planning phases. However, a "dependency paradox" emerged during execution, while the evaluation phase showed critical literacy deficiencies due to automation bias. The study concludes that uncontrolled GenAI use jeopardizes students' procedural skills and epistemic agency. It recommends reorienting curricula toward Critical AI Literacy and AI-TPACK frameworks to safeguard intellectual autonomy.
Downloads
References
Bauer, E., Richters, C., Pickal, A., Klippert, M., Sailer, M., & Stadler, M. (2025). Effects of AI-generated adaptive feedback on statistical skills and interest in statistics: a field experiment in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1735–1757. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13609
Berg, G., & Plessis, D. (2023). Chatgpt and generative ai: possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative ai: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Diržytė, A. (2025). Large language models and the enhancement of human cognition: some theoretical insights. Filosofija Sociologija, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2025.36.1.2
Evstigneev, M., & Evstigneeva, I. (2025). Developing prompt engineering skills in the pre-service training of foreign language educator. Tambov University Review Series Humanities, 30(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-4-795-813
Haetami, H. (2025). AI-Driven Educational Transformation in Indonesia: From Learning Personalization to Institutional Management. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7448
Jayasuriya, R., Selvanayaki, S., Deepa, N., Muruganandhi, D., & Kalpana, M. (2025). Assessing the Impact of GPTs on Critical thinking, Creativity and Independent Problem solving in Academic learning of students. Research Square (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6367830/v1
Karamuk, E. (2025). The automation trap BT - Educational Technology and the Future of Education (pp. 147–170). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0122-8.ch007
Lubbe, A., Marais, E., & Kruger, D. (2025). Cultivating independent thinkers: the triad of artificial intelligence, bloom’s taxonomy and critical thinking in assessment pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 30(12), 17589–17622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13476-x
Matueny, R., & Nyamai, J. (2025). Illusion of Competence and Skill Degradation in Artificial Intelligence Dependency among Users. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, XII(V), 1725–1738. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.120500163
Miles, A., & Huberman. (2020). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Universitas Indonesia.
Moufida, B., & Amira, S. (2025). Between support and dependence: ai tool usage in university assignments — a case study at souk ahras university. South Florida Journal of Development, 6(5), e5416. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv6n5-098
Mustopa, M., Nasikhin, N., Chamami, R., Nihayah, H., Habibullah, M., & Manshur, A. (2024). Challenges in artificial intelligence development in higher education in china, india, and indonesia: international students’ perspectives. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.17
Nasikin, M., Abzar, M., & Afandi, N. K. (2024). Strengthening Islamic Religious Education Teacher Competencies in the Society 5.0 Era: Challenges and Interventions. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5728
Ning, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. (2024). Teachers’ AI-TPACK: Exploring the Relationship between Knowledge Elements. Sustainability, 16(3), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978
OBAY, M., & Çelik, H. (2021). Mathematical problem-solving process: negative mental behaviours displayed by pre-service mathematics teachers. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(4), 2176–2190. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.887111
Öçal, M., & Şimşek, M. (2016). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ problem solving processes with geometer’s sketchpad: mirror problem. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(2), 577. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.v5i2.5000180307
Özer, M., Tanberkan, H., & Perc, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Threatens Critical Thinking in Education Systems. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 15(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1747885
Pratiwi, H., Riwanda, A., Hasruddin, H., Sujarwo, S., & Syamsudin, A. (2025). Transforming learning or creating dependency teachers perspectives and barriers to ai integration in education. Journal of Pedagogical Research. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202531677
Putri, K., & Naf’ihima, F. (2025). Pre-Service Teacher’ Perceptions of Generative AI: Dependency, Effect, and Ethics. Edulink Education and Linguistics Knowledge Journal, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.32503/edulink.v7i1.6834
Riva, G. (2025). The architecture of cognitive amplification: enhanced cognitive scaffolding as a resolution to the comfort-growth paradox in AI-supported learning. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4wcdb_v2
Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative, And R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta, CV.
Tunjera, N., & Chigona, A. (2023). Investigating effective ways to use artificial intelligence in teacher education. European Conference on E-Learning, 22(1), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.22.1.1625
Yan, L., Pammer‐Schindler, V., Mills, C., Nguyen, A., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beyond efficiency: Empirical insights on generative AI ’s impact on cognition, metacognition and epistemic agency in learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1675–1685. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70000
Yuliani, H. (2025). Integration of PBL-Based E-Modules in Physics Education: Improving Problem-Solving Skills on Static Fluid Concept. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.26618/0ddpg995
Zaharah, Z., Basyit, A., Husein, M. T., Fauzi, A., Arif, Z., & Sina, I. (2024). Revolutionizing Learning: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Islamic Education and the Wave of Transformation. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6078
Zhang, Y., Tian, H., & Lu, J. (2025). The relationship between higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills development among pre-service teachers using generative ai: an analysis based on moderated mediation. BMC Psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03404-4
Copyright (c) 2026 Thierry Ferdinanda, Tiara Anggia Dewi, Desi Budiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Simki Pedagogia : https://jiped.org/index.php/JSP/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
